Skin grafting and tissue replacement effective for diabetic foot ulcers

Skin grafting and tissue replacement effective for diabetic foot ulcers

Brian McAvoy
PEARLS No.
517
Clinical question

How effective are skin grafting and tissue replacement for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes?

Bottom line

Skin grafts and tissue replacements, used in conjunction with standard care, increased the healing rate of foot ulcers and led to slightly fewer amputations in people with diabetes, compared with standard care. Evidence of long-term effectiveness was lacking and cost-effectiveness was uncertain. There was not enough evidence to be able to recommend a specific type of skin graft or tissue replacement. No differences were found for “ulcer recurrence” and “incidence of infection” between groups. There were no differences in the occurrence of adverse events between the intervention and the control group.

Caveat

For the outcome “incidence of complete closure of the ulcer” quality of evidence was low, and for “total incidence of lower limb amputations” quality of evidence was very low. The potential benefits of skin graft and tissue replacements should be weighed against the high costs of these products.

Context

Foot ulceration is a major problem in people with diabetes and is the leading cause of hopitalisation and limb amputations. Skin grafts and tissue replacement can be used to reconstruct skin defects for people with diabetic foot ulcers in addition to providing them with standard care. Skin substitutes can consist of bioengineered or artificial skin, autografts (taken from the patient), allografts (taken from another person) or xenografts (taken from animals).

Cochrane Systematic Review

Santema PB et al. Skin grafting and tissue replacement for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes. Cochrane Reviews, 2016, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD011255.DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD011255.pub2. This review contains 17 studies involving 1,655 participants.

 

Cochrane Systematic Reviews for primary care practitioners
Developed by the Cochrane Primary Care Field, New Zealand Branch of the Australasian Cochrane Centre at the Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland and funded by the Ministry of Health and New Zealand Doctor. PEARLS are meant for educational use and not to guide clinical care. New Zealanders can access the Cochrane Library free via www.cochrane.org.nz