Respiratory physician Lutz Beckert considers chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management, including the prevention of COPD, the importance of smoking cessation and pulmonary rehabilitation, and the lifesaving potential of addressing treatable traits. He also discusses the logic of inhaler therapy, moving from single therapy to dual and triple therapy when indicated, as well as other aspects of management
Insufficient evidence for antihistamines for the common cold
Vault Navigation
Insufficient evidence for antihistamines for the common cold
How effective are antihistamines for the common cold?
In adults, there was a short-term beneficial effect on the severity of overall symptoms on the first or second day of treatment (45% felt better versus 38% with placebo), but there was no difference between antihistamines and placebo in the mid to long term. There was no clinically significant effect on nasal obstruction, rhinorrhoea or sneezing. Although side effects were more common with sedating antihistamines, the difference was not statistically significant. There was no evidence of effectiveness of antihistamines for the common cold in children.
In a number of trials, data were insufficiently reported, or were not in the appropriate format to enter into a meta-analysis. The meta-analyses mostly included only some of the available trials and provided an incomplete assessment of the quality of the evidence. Many of the included trials were conducted in the 1980s and 1990s, with the most recent trial from 2001. All trials received financial support from pharmaceutical companies.
The common cold affects people of all age groups and, although, in most cases, it is self-limiting, it causes significant morbidity. Antihistamines are available over the counter and may be used by patients affected by the common cold.
De Sutter An IM et al. Antihistamines for the common cold. Cochrane Reviews, 2015, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD009345.DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD009345.pub2. This review contains 18 studies involving 4342 participants.
Cochrane Systematic Reviews for primary care practitioners
Developed by the Cochrane Primary Care Field, New Zealand Branch of the Australasian Cochrane Centre at the Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland and funded by the Ministry of Health and New Zealand Doctor. PEARLS are meant for educational use and not to guide clinical care. New Zealanders can access the Cochrane Library free via www.cochrane.org.nz