Hands up if you can explain localities - Tim Tenbensel gives it a go

FREE READ
+Cover Story
In print

Hands up if you can explain localities - Tim Tenbensel gives it a go

Martin
Johnston
3 minutes to Read + 5 minutes to Delve
Location Pin CD MicroStrockHub.png
[Image: MicroStockHub on iStock]

Provider networks grouped in localities are meant to be the organising principle for primary and community care in the Government’s reformed health system. But the decision-makers have not clarified what localities will be. Martin Johnston went looking for answers. We are rolling out the answers to those questions, over the next few days

What we know about localities

Localities were pitched in the Government’s health reform announcements last April as a central feature for the primary and community healthcare of the future.

Nearly $46 million was granted in Budget 2021 for developing up to six prototype localities over four years.

The Health and Disability Review Transition Unit in December published a “long list” of 13 health districts where it was considering establishing prototype localities.

The first prototypes were to be established by 31 March, but the unit changed the deadline to March or April.

The draft reform legislation provides for locality boundaries to be determined from mid-2024, with the requirement for locality plans to be developed from mid-2025.

The Transition Unit’s co-director for localities, Helen Parker, published a brief note in January saying the prototypes will be phase one of the localities plan. Phase two would begin late this year.

It appeared what phase two would actually do hadn’t been decided. Ms Parker wrote: “[We’re] starting to look at areas that could be included…” She later declined to be interviewed.

Localities will be distinct from locality networks, although the two terms often merge in discussion of the topic.

A locality will be a geographical area – and an organising principle. It will come with a plan following consultation and probably a set of commissioning contracts.

The Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Bill requires Health New Zealand to develop locality plans that set out priority outcomes and services. The agency must consult the Māori Health Authority, iwi Māori partnership boards, consumers or communities, and “social sector agencies and other entities that contribute to relevant population outcomes within the locality”.

Locality networks are groupings of primary and community healthcare providers and social service organisations.

Health NZ is taking over the development of localities from the Transition Unit. The work is headed temporarily by Martin Hefford, former chief executive of Tū Ora Compass Health PHO.

In the absence of definitive information from the Government, New Zealand Doctor Rata Aotearoa has sought the views of primary care leaders and health academics on this topic.

New Zealand Doctor Rata Aotearoa: Questions on Localities
Download384.04 KB
Federation of Primary Health Aotearoa NZ response on localities
Download1.52 MB
Collaborative Aotearoa response on localities
Download1.11 MB
University of Auckland health policy researcher Tim Tenbensel, by email

It isn’t clear to Dr Tenbensel what there is to be “owned” in a locality.

“Localities, as geographically defined areas, look like they will be subunits of Health NZ regions. The provider networks would include the whole range of organisational types. “What we don’t really know is how the networks will be organised and governed. I guess that is what the prototype process is about.”

He says the distinction between localities as geographic areas and provider networks was always there in some form.

Dr Tenbensel wonders whether DHB boundaries will be relevant to the definition of localities in the minds of the reformers. He initially thought they would lose relevance with time, because localities are meant to cover smaller populations, but is not sure this view has persisted.

He says an important unanswered question is how localities will connect with hospitals. The biggest risk he sees in the reforms is that the gulf between hospitals and primary/community care may become even more difficult to bridge.

“[How] much airtime will primary and community care get in the management and governance of Health NZ? If it was a struggle…in DHBs, particularly the larger ones, how much more challenging is it going to be under the new structure?”

He sees potential for the health reforms to improve equity of healthcare access but, regarding equity of outcomes, he says it is always hard to detect whether any changes are the result of reforms.

But even regarding equity of access, he adds that COVID’s impact, for instance, on cancer diagnosis and early treatment, means localities will be starting when equity of access has deteriorated.

Dr Tenbensel thinks the localities time frame is realistic and strikes a reasonable balance. “When you rush big changes of this type, you tend to end up with lots of loose ends and unintended consequences.”

Tomorrow, we hear from Practice Managers and Administrators Association of New Zealand chair Michelle Te Kira. If you would like to read the complete feature, click here.

PreviousNext