The impact of CVD on independence

The impact of CVD on independence

Advertising Material
This content was supplied and paid for by Hato Hone St John
2 minutes to Read
St John HC May 2024
Referring your community-living older patients with CVD for a St John Medical Alarm is one way to support their independence

In the year following a heart attack, more than 40% of patients experience health declines in physical function and/or ability to live independently.4

While cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally, it is also a major threat to function, independence and quality of life,1 which are all important health priorities for older adults.2

Potential for loss of independence

Older adults make up the majority of people who have a heart attack.3 In the year following a heart attack, more than 40% of patients experience health declines in physical function and/or ability to live independently.4

A common complication of a heart attack is heart failure,5 which poses a risk to independence. The inability of seniors with heart failure to perform daily tasks and participate in social activities has been linked to a higher risk of mortality and/or hospitalisation.6,7

A specific risk to the independence of older adults with heart failure or following a heart attack is a greater propensity to fall, which is associated with increased mortality, morbidity, and re-hospitalisation rates.8

Need for assistance

An analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry data found that 76% of heart attacks occur in the home and 63% are unwitnessed.9 The analysis also showed that the majority of out-of-hospital heart attacks occur in older adults and their survival rate after a heart attack is half that of younger adults (6.5% vs 13% in those aged ≥65 years vs 0–64 years).10 A longer time between the onset of symptoms and arrival at hospital (≥ 4 vs < 4hrs) leading to a delay in receiving coronary reperfusion after a heart attack has been demonstrated to be associated with significantly (p<0.03) higher mortality.11

This highlights the importance of timely medical intervention after a heart attack or other acute CVD event in community-living seniors to minimise the risk of serious health outcomes and loss of independence.

Need for reassurance

Many older adults are aware of the unpredictable nature of their health and the risk to their continued independence.12 Anxiety, fear, and uncertainty about their future are among the challenges of living with CVD.13 Unpredictable health is a reality for individuals with coronary artery disease who are at risk of a potentially serious adverse CVD event at any moment.14 Furthermore, CVD in older adults typically occurs in a context of multimorbidity in which multiple medical conditions can interact with unpredictable consequences including increased risk of falling.8,15

Having access to timely medical intervention may help to mitigate the anxiety associated with the unpredictable nature of CVD and the potential for loss of independence in your older patients.

Facilitating assistance and reassurance

Referring your community-living older patients with CVD for a St John Medical Alarm is one way to support their independence. This can provide reassurance by giving them a direct link to expert care in an emergency.

Users of a medical alarm report feeling safer, more secure, and less anxious than non-users (including reduced anxiety about falling), giving them the confidence to continue living in their own home.16,17 Users of a medical alarm also report being more active around the home than non-users, potentially helping them to avert functional decline and allowing them to continue to live independently.16

A St John Medical Alarm offers 24/7 response and is the only medical alarm that connects directly to Hato Hone St John. Your patients can access a FREE trial, and a referral is easily arranged using your Practice Management System via Healthlink or ERMS.

For additional information visit: stjohnalarms.org.nz/hcp

References

1. Murphy E, et al. Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in the Older Adult: Part 2. 2023: 67-138.

2. Goyal P, et al. Geriatric Cardiology: Coming of Age. JACC Adv. 2022;1(3).

3. Mehta RH, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: differences by age. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(3):736-41.

4. Dodson JA, et al. Physical function and independence one year following myocardial infarction: Observations from the TRIUMPH registry. Am Heart J. 2012;163(5):790-796.

5. Jenča D, et al. Heart failure after myocardial infarction: incidence and predictors. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8(1):222-237.

6. Dunlay SM, et al. Activities of daily living and outcomes in heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8(2):261-267.

7. Uchmanowicz I, et al. Frailty syndrome and rehospitalizations in elderly heart failure patients. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30(6):617-623.

8. Mikos M, et al. Link between cardiovascular disease and the risk of failing: a comprehensive review of the evidence. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021;131(4):369-376.

9. Bray J, et al. The epidemiology of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Australia and New Zealand: A binational report from the Australasian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (Aus-ROC). Resuscitation. 2022;172:74-83.

10. Dicker B, et al. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry: Aotearoa New Zealand, National Report 2020/21.

11. Hannan EL, et al. Effect of onset-to-door time and door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions for st-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(2):143-7.

12. McKenna AC, et al. Purchasing and using personal emergency response systems (PERS): how decisions are made by community-dwelling seniors in Canada. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:81.

13. Burger SA, et al. Living with cardiovascular disease (CVD): Exploring the biggest challenges for people affected by CVD in the UK, and their use (or not) of online resources. Patient Experience Journal. 2020;7(83-97).

14. Hirshfeld JW, Jr., et al. Predicting the unpredictable in coronary artery disease: From lumenography, to physiology, to plaque morphology. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(16):1917-1919.

15. Forman DE, et al. Multimorbidity in older adults with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(19):2149-2161.

16. De San Miguel K, et al. Personal emergency alarms: do health outcomes differ for purchasers and nonpurchasers? Home Health Care Serv Q. 2017;36(3-4):164-177.

17. De San Miguel K, et al. Personal emergency alarms: what impact do they have on older people’s lives? Australas J Ageing. 2008;27(2):103-105.